Twitter debates are my favorite, and I fell sideways into one last week, as opposed to starting one jumping in with both feet like I normally do. It began with a simple tweet from Mike Masnick (of TechDirt):
It was in reference to a long, tall, beast of a tube that will put space craft and their inhabitants closer to orbit before launch, being built by a company named Thoth. Thoth is a Canadian company whose website is not thoth.com, but thothx.com. Interesting, because that’s kind of like the suffix of another space company.
Anyway, all I did (she said innocently, while batting her eyes) is retweet it which caught the attention of my colleague Nick Gross. The reply tweets that ensued are referenced below, and as you can see it escalated quickly:
I’ll not post the rest of the exchange because male posturing ensued and we all know that means denigrating each other’s…colleges. There was jail time mentioned, federal crimes, it got kinda ugly and all over what? The fact that companies sometimes patent stuff they never intend to build.
Why might a company do that, you ask? Well, there’s the option that Intellectual Ventures takes, which is to patent stuff so they can go sue people. I wondered to myself if that’s what Thoth had in mind…maybe they should patent their technology because Space Tube Elevator Lift Kit technology is sure to be a hot thing these days and they had better protect their “innovation” lest someone beat them to the atmosphere.
I expected to come up with a goose egg when I search for competition on this particular space race, but low and behold it seems that building a a giant corrugated tube up to the sky is, indeed, a “thing”, as this Kickstarter intimates. Then there’s this page, which is straight out of 1990, but talks nonetheless about a space elevator. There were a few others, enough to make me think that maybe this was a defensive patenting move.
Maybe it’s a licensing play? Patent the technology, never intending to build such an unwieldy beast, and just license it to others to fund your existing products (none of which, by the way, are on anywhere near this scale)?
The point of the argument on Twitter was that Thoth did indeed secure funding to build, though strangely the article linked by @JNGross only talks about how much it would cost, not the source of the money, so that meant that they weren’t just another company patenting something for the other reasons I listed above. And OK, you have a point there, but seriously? You’re going to blow someone else’s $5-10 Billion on a 30% reduction in rocket fuel costs and possible gains in efficiency?
I’m not a rocket scientist because I didn’t go to CalTech or MIT, but good golly, Miss Molly…that’s a pretty low ROI.
IPTT
{Church lady meme found here, and obviously ©SNL}