From IP Nav’s comments about the recent Consumer Electronics Show, that ratio sits at about seven to one. I always enjoy IP Nav‘s comments on things mostly because I think that Barry Leff writes them and I like him. Never having met him in person, I do believe that he genuinely believes he’s on the right side of this debate, and I like that in a person.
Anyway, here’s a visual for you right-brainers out there:
Evidently, Erich Spangenberg was unhappy that he was the only one on his side of the line up for a talk that was part of the CES Innovation Policy Summit. Leaving aside
the fact my opinion that patents do not equal innovation, it seems the summit drew a crowd, or at least the “Patent Litigation Reform: Who are You Calling a Troll?” panel did. (For the record, the answer to the question is “You, Erich.”)
Barry’s blog post for IP Nav takes us on a trip down memory lane, because nothing holds one’s interest more than a story about how a troll became a troll. But oops, wait just a second. We shouldn’t call Mr. Spangenberg a troll because
He’s not uncomfortable with the term “troll,” as the term has come to mean anyone who files a patent lawsuit.
Don’t make me pull out the Harvey Specter eye roll so early on a Monday morning, please. *sigh*
Not anyone who files a patent lawsuit is a troll. You sound like J Nicholas Gross or Andy Pitchford now. Further, definitely not everyone who files a patent lawsuit is a troll either, only those who behave like thugs are. You know, like people who go after everyone and their uncle (and even the US Government, for crying out loud) because they have a crap patent that says you can’t scan and email without paying them to do it. And oh, look! You agree (emphasis mine):
Picking on app developers, tiny companies and sending letters with no justification is crazy—
Indeed. But want to hear what’s even crazier? Suing people using one of your shell companies and not even telling them what they infringed on. (This is a good write up of those wanton antics, with a great quote from a Techdirt article on same.) Oh, don’t throw out that tired line about it affecting declaratory judgment and venue. What you’re trying to do is extract a settlement because taking it to court is more expensive. That’s the troll MO, whether the troll uses base-less threatening letters or not.
One final quote from the article:
Bad behavior is not exclusively the province of patent owners.
No, it isn’t. But it’s the province of companies like IP Nav, and there are at least seven normal people who can agree on that.